Judging from the casinos I've been in, I would say this live vs. online comparison is about right. Here in Stuttgart, the 2/4€ Cash Game is about as skillful as the 2/4c Cash Game online, although, admittedly, there are a couple of sharks in the casino, easy to avoid though.
Speaking of online poker, of course the level of play is different basicly on every table, let alone different platforms. Having played a lot on both PokerStars and PartyPoker, I assume the level of play on PokerStars is roughly as good as the subsequent higher level on PartyPoker. I have about the same BB/100 rate at PokerStars' NL50 as I have on PartyPoker's NL100. Playing NL100 on PokerStars, I'm having more problems making money. People will 3bet a lot more often, but also laydown their hands quite some time if getting 4betted.
If the Pokerroom does also provide casino games, I have found the play in these rooms way more fishy (PartyPoker provides casino games, PokerStars doesn't... ^^). I think that people who just want to gamble rather play live so the level of play is better online. That allows for some rather creative plays online in comparison to live poker, so it's not all bad. With more action due to multi-tabling, opponents who at least seem to know what they're doing and more flexibility, I actually prefer online poker in general. Of course, live poker is very different and features some dimensions of the game I wouldn't toally miss out on... |